Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 23:43:33 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6FA5917CC9C8FE2F5DE96D6C0C4C4DA8480CEB02CFC92BB4AB6963DF949619C6
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details