Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 09:18:14 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6ECC2A9EF14F6583CE1457D8B1C48564241D2FBBC180C9CCE035F4BE8C4A5380
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details