Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 13:59:38 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 614C8145A776D3C16AC4F2AB98AFCDBFC5E5B0446A4C097E8BB5E2148838EEC0
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details