Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 07:19:44 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4B3CF4A00EEE19AB11A7D92C73734FB1BF788B94D3926E1E599CBD688C19CF1C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details