Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 08:49:52 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3F18E620A13DFF19B14FDFE634D62C24612406F1A6067AAB12EE8E1919C7D7EE
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details