Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 06:15:42 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 258ABA65C03923A3B11A7F86CFC789604C38EA5BF97B8BF7FD7336CC0BED3578
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details