Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 22:54:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0BE88BCD4AC1F0567051522B082EB1B55C80AF027D3095D97680AD3D7A0D21ED
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details