Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 02:21:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574
Participant Details

Original Note:

Any wrong or controversial statement can be retroactively reframed as satire. For context, the claims in her essay come from Afrocentrism’s Melanin Theory. It’s pseudoscience but stubbornly widespread. Readers can judge for themselves whether she took it seriously at the time. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691117904/contentious-curricula

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1695197426431209634
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 17FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574
createdAtMillis - 1693016509277
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 169519742643120963417FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574