Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 22:23:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F526A4B972D704DB566DD358DF72E820254568DDEA9D49955764E3161C24596
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Geen misleidende info, maar persoonlijke mening. Volgens hem zijn in het artikel genoemde methoden blijkbaar geoorloofd om activisten op te sporen. Discussies over hoe dubieus die opsporingsmethodes wel of niet zijn, horen in gewone posts thuis - niet in community-notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695196675344617531
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F526A4B972D704DB566DD358DF72E820254568DDEA9D49955764E3161C24596
  • createdAtMillis - 1693002180999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16951966753446175311F526A4B972D704DB566DD358DF72E820254568DDEA9D49955764E3161C24596