Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 04:27:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04AB2C0C6923C1E1960AFD6EE8E3F4895E4AD35E3D8E538856398FC064B7B6F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. „Accuweather.com“ is hardly a credible source compared to multiple real scientific works, that do actually support the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695195838257967176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04AB2C0C6923C1E1960AFD6EE8E3F4895E4AD35E3D8E538856398FC064B7B6F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1693024024062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169519583825796717604AB2C0C6923C1E1960AFD6EE8E3F4895E4AD35E3D8E538856398FC064B7B6F6