Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 07:46:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4834B2B11EE6E0B8F641679DE0A7702A3FFBB588EFDE43A596457B0CDBC31C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The use of "breaking" and "to be deemed unconstitutional" in the post imply imminent action in the case but the article, posted in a follow up post, is opinion and legal theory of the author about the case, not a ruling or commentary from the court.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695177583422222668
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4834B2B11EE6E0B8F641679DE0A7702A3FFBB588EFDE43A596457B0CDBC31C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1693036004820
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695177583422222668D4834B2B11EE6E0B8F641679DE0A7702A3FFBB588EFDE43A596457B0CDBC31C7