Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 16:28:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F02FEEE5E5CE91E02997B069AEE20D91D3786D09ED802E4CA91459802E1EEB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The use of "breaking" and "to be deemed unconstitutional" in the post imply imminent action in the case but the article, posted in a follow up post, is opinion and legal theory of the author about the case, not a ruling or commentary from the court.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695177583422222668
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F02FEEE5E5CE91E02997B069AEE20D91D3786D09ED802E4CA91459802E1EEB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1693067284922
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16951775834222226686F02FEEE5E5CE91E02997B069AEE20D91D3786D09ED802E4CA91459802E1EEB3