Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 22:03:05 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E1305D118B497577237E228302BB93DE7380011FDD27DF51C05C97C871015F6E
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details