Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 20:30:00 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D4C7FE91EED5CBD482C183BC1656B394262200027B4B38C47CF94F53B2B9E934
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details