Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 12:19:52 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CE0D3304FD1582109DF3571D635CAA14BB4109103E6F50BC2FAB66F38DBBB757
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details