Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 13:57:44 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B872E9E9827599E960E0A04E9A36559F4502994FA4F9CAF5B3E68E5279F5458E
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details