Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 11:47:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: AF70D9D7B3D6ACC81FE7C260917CC4888D9B6AC9DE8B3FD2855A32D8C5020A4C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details