Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 21:06:49 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: AA24B0B3DD8DE234E99D9F5D5A374CFBB9DAE5EBA64B99BB80D58751DBCE497D
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details