Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 18:23:51 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 9F7A5371FFE3329BDE45A893A03B64A8559FA8AA33C625E81FA0E4E37DA2CFD3
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details