Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-27 05:13:33 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 92763E14AA3AA4EEB8497D26FBEA78EC949D2DA6C4E5BE433325E7D01096271F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details