Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 04:02:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8351F2F6ADB655F78A4D3559F2CBA923232F8228F43308E5E807EB83A2B67E5E
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details