Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 11:31:51 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7D578D5EF624668CE3CCC662AEA415946F453B7AB8B36B8C64A2C8DCE69BB6F6
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details