Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 21:15:22 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4499E96D7EBEE7957357BA39EB1332E1D5BB3A35C056D3AE3D7E92C41A5F43C9
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details