Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 20:38:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3D40F172032B47D4212672372B9F68D66F99B49AB139A09136A7F85C53DB865C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details