Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-27 13:48:36 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2EC33BDF8C10819DE465BB80DD2369CE1359DD25962C8DD5A6B714E117C4D465
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details