Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 15:32:28 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 21C6C6927FD9E699B93DE4AF14A55B262E0DAA524CF48F397B13E3DA0B81B085
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details