Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 21:56:27 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1E1BC3A5CE1BBDF017E09C60F414BCA8C0B9F904FF6137B1BE7085BA93E4B9FF
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details