Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 09:27:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 19195F489912B1BBBA6816A342EED17B129C4DE2E171EDA7FE0624C707A05A98
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details