Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 22:53:50 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0BE88BCD4AC1F0567051522B082EB1B55C80AF027D3095D97680AD3D7A0D21ED
Participant Details
Original Note:
The court refused Mr Fox's appeal that the original judge was wrong in declining to define the meaning of “racist”; ruling the decision entirely legitimate. NO definition of "racist" was given by either judge. Mr Fox's claims here are therefore innacurate. Para 42 & 56 👇🏻 https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details