Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 18:35:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7FA30EDA03186A6FB8B274C4DD8C8DA91071568A4AD37E31EFA0C10091607B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

No necesita contexto adicional, es una realidad el hecho de que se rebajó la pena y en este tiempo ha vuelto a violar, dejando claro que la ley del solo sí fue un fallo y dando la razón al twitero.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695135223829184593
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7FA30EDA03186A6FB8B274C4DD8C8DA91071568A4AD37E31EFA0C10091607B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1692988556629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695135223829184593E7FA30EDA03186A6FB8B274C4DD8C8DA91071568A4AD37E31EFA0C10091607B6