Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 18:12:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7AE8A89FA88FD741E97F14BD22E97EA5A95DC0E6EAF2CD7BE0AB79B2F7BDFA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

No necesita contexto adicional, es una realidad el hecho de que se rebajó la pena y en este tiempo ha vuelto a violar, dejando claro que la ley del solo sí fue un fallo y dando la razón al twitero.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695135223829184593
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7AE8A89FA88FD741E97F14BD22E97EA5A95DC0E6EAF2CD7BE0AB79B2F7BDFA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1692987132962
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695135223829184593C7AE8A89FA88FD741E97F14BD22E97EA5A95DC0E6EAF2CD7BE0AB79B2F7BDFA3