Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 19:59:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 957B3BE8D89C21A2A93D25C2B7221C065B9A7BD9A1C6C77122B7A61EAC4948B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

No necesita contexto adicional, es una realidad el hecho de que se rebajó la pena y en este tiempo ha vuelto a violar, dejando claro que la ley del solo sí fue un fallo y dando la razón al twitero.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695135223829184593
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 957B3BE8D89C21A2A93D25C2B7221C065B9A7BD9A1C6C77122B7A61EAC4948B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1692993574454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695135223829184593957B3BE8D89C21A2A93D25C2B7221C065B9A7BD9A1C6C77122B7A61EAC4948B6