Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 06:01:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97F54D536291322D13FDF71FC85419332BE78AB788ED26CF78D1FAB111072622
Participant Details

Original Note:

The strength of the evidence base for gender affirming care is the subject of intense medical debate. SEGM comments on some weaknesses in the JAMA Surgery study here: https://segm.org/long-term-regret-satisfaction-mastectomy-critical-appraisal Systematic reviews conducted in Sweden and the UK do not support gender affirming care for minors: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.16791 https://cass.independent-review.uk/nice-evidence-reviews/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695115021162881166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97F54D536291322D13FDF71FC85419332BE78AB788ED26CF78D1FAB111072622
  • createdAtMillis - 1693202490303
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169511502116288116697F54D536291322D13FDF71FC85419332BE78AB788ED26CF78D1FAB111072622