Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 14:43:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3FFD02606AD0CBFA4DD92E7C4C7949E7A43E5AB3232FEE79723BDFE5A5F1E27
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author blatantly implies an over-reaction on the part of the officer, whereas he was simply doing his duty and trying to protect himself. There was no possible way for the officer to make any other determination than they did, as the event unfolded.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695071996491575654
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3FFD02606AD0CBFA4DD92E7C4C7949E7A43E5AB3232FEE79723BDFE5A5F1E27
  • createdAtMillis - 1692974619845
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695071996491575654B3FFD02606AD0CBFA4DD92E7C4C7949E7A43E5AB3232FEE79723BDFE5A5F1E27