Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 13:55:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B2A51F392B0B347B2577D30007F032C284070D6672AE7A7659FCE16D01164D0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author blatantly implies an over-reaction on the part of the officer, whereas he was simply doing his duty and trying to protect himself. There was no possible way for the officer to make any other determination than they did, as the event unfolded.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695071996491575654
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B2A51F392B0B347B2577D30007F032C284070D6672AE7A7659FCE16D01164D0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1692971701294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1695071996491575654B2A51F392B0B347B2577D30007F032C284070D6672AE7A7659FCE16D01164D0F