Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 22:37:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A47503054F08B244B9A57C4A3FF375FDC62CED4902984551049A7DFF172643F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author blatantly implies an over-reaction on the part of the officer, whereas he was simply doing his duty and trying to protect himself. There was no possible way for the officer to make any other determination than they did, as the event unfolded.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695071996491575654
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A47503054F08B244B9A57C4A3FF375FDC62CED4902984551049A7DFF172643F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1693003026110
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1695071996491575654A47503054F08B244B9A57C4A3FF375FDC62CED4902984551049A7DFF172643F5