Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 21:28:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author blatantly implies an over-reaction on the part of the officer, whereas he was simply doing his duty and trying to protect himself. There was no possible way for the officer to make any other determination than they did, as the event unfolded.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695071996491575654
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574
  • createdAtMillis - 1692998936099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169507199649157565417FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574