Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 06:09:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B2CF4DB5FC8F59E1A16A571B6249548E27DF7EFDAE7830D40C9EB05D4E4AF00
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author blatantly implies an over-reaction on the part of the officer, whereas he was simply doing his duty and trying to protect himself. There was no possible way for the officer to make any other determination than they did, as the event unfolded.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695071996491575654
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B2CF4DB5FC8F59E1A16A571B6249548E27DF7EFDAE7830D40C9EB05D4E4AF00
  • createdAtMillis - 1693030171586
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16950719964915756540B2CF4DB5FC8F59E1A16A571B6249548E27DF7EFDAE7830D40C9EB05D4E4AF00