Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 03:48:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E28270CB395F16731080081F502867297F477144B78EEF5D17D7F49A01EC0E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the study was withdrawn over ethical consent issues (not political). Neither the publication nor the retraction of the paper cannot be used to infer the validity of the study. Until a study conforming to accepted methodology is published, it is unproductive to debate here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695061192824303668
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E28270CB395F16731080081F502867297F477144B78EEF5D17D7F49A01EC0E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1693021716882
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16950611928243036684E28270CB395F16731080081F502867297F477144B78EEF5D17D7F49A01EC0E0