Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 11:33:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D6518620D7DEAC0EAAF7CEA338D17E8F99DE1E0E10C776B3693855CE9AEE3D2
Participant Details

Original Note:

It’s not true. The Canadian government says the measure sought to clarify that the child's best interest should be considered above all else, and experts say the language defining when child protective services should take action remains unchanged. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32173861/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695030180354687041
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D6518620D7DEAC0EAAF7CEA338D17E8F99DE1E0E10C776B3693855CE9AEE3D2
  • createdAtMillis - 1692963225096
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16950301803546870415D6518620D7DEAC0EAAF7CEA338D17E8F99DE1E0E10C776B3693855CE9AEE3D2