Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 13:45:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BB1E6AD30769235A3F73A29AE0BE3F1E78600DAA9A9E5788960AE09D20B2600
Participant Details

Original Note:

It’s not true. The Canadian government says the measure sought to clarify that the child's best interest should be considered above all else, and experts say the language defining when child protective services should take action remains unchanged. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32173861/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695030180354687041
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BB1E6AD30769235A3F73A29AE0BE3F1E78600DAA9A9E5788960AE09D20B2600
  • createdAtMillis - 1692971134154
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16950301803546870412BB1E6AD30769235A3F73A29AE0BE3F1E78600DAA9A9E5788960AE09D20B2600