Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 06:14:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 014848DE07AAD612D6CFABD8E6A8A1C2EE98F561B8CF2B8806E13CBA2068E6A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

La mancanza di fonti nel tweet non lo rende fuorviante a priori. La nota proposta non porta un esempio specifico di una carica dello stato attualmente assegnata su base familiare, ma tratta invece il nepotismo in generale, รจ quindi irrilevante rispetto al tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694887035188765048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 014848DE07AAD612D6CFABD8E6A8A1C2EE98F561B8CF2B8806E13CBA2068E6A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1693116855260
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1694887035188765048014848DE07AAD612D6CFABD8E6A8A1C2EE98F561B8CF2B8806E13CBA2068E6A5