Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 13:03:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA0DDC77E762C7A684F6A331C4A2E3220E827E0CCE5B97CEE9D0CB636D76F719
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Meinung des Schweizer Historikers sollte so stehen bleiben, auch wenn sie nicht Mainstream im „Westen“ ist. Es hilft in diesem Fall nicht, als Gegenargument eine westliche Bundesbehörde als Quelle zu zitieren.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694810139138646343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA0DDC77E762C7A684F6A331C4A2E3220E827E0CCE5B97CEE9D0CB636D76F719
  • createdAtMillis - 1692968583978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1694810139138646343FA0DDC77E762C7A684F6A331C4A2E3220E827E0CCE5B97CEE9D0CB636D76F719