Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 20:28:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31D35D6F75246E603D6DB77357EFC953A9F14C802876B1AEF7E4322D39757D61
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce juge n'a pas été condamné pour sa décision. Il a été condamné pour avoir biaisé le jugement et ne pas avoir respecter la procédure, pour des raisons politiques. https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/thueringen/mitte-thueringen/weimar/familienrichter-corona-masken-prozess-urteil-102.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694776592768127362
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 31D35D6F75246E603D6DB77357EFC953A9F14C802876B1AEF7E4322D39757D61
  • createdAtMillis - 1693081717871
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169477659276812736231D35D6F75246E603D6DB77357EFC953A9F14C802876B1AEF7E4322D39757D61