Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-24 19:00:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D487CE17E5086B8F9B8F7507FE6A85526EB587D4A1388F0BA77E630BCBAA262
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, and argumentative. The claim is correct and backed by a source. It’s irrelevant who used West’s account - the point being made is that West was allowed to have one by a bank who bans others while claiming to be “ethical”. Disagreement should go in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694744786266124515
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D487CE17E5086B8F9B8F7507FE6A85526EB587D4A1388F0BA77E630BCBAA262
  • createdAtMillis - 1692903609336
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16947447862661245159D487CE17E5086B8F9B8F7507FE6A85526EB587D4A1388F0BA77E630BCBAA262