Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-25 00:13:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7EF4B9D2D3B88FDF299DBEC23978413D3219E7B8B743FE7C6C56C6134055C62E
Participant Details

Original Note:

補足情報や国民感情が読み取れないので、風評被害防止のためにもニュースのコメント欄を開放すべきです X(旧Twitter)上では概ね科学的根拠の全く無い全面禁止ですが、賛成的意見が多数占めており国内消費が捗る事を願っているとの声が多く見られます

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694604137709936740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7EF4B9D2D3B88FDF299DBEC23978413D3219E7B8B743FE7C6C56C6134055C62E
  • createdAtMillis - 1692922400291
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16946041377099367407EF4B9D2D3B88FDF299DBEC23978413D3219E7B8B743FE7C6C56C6134055C62E