Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-24 05:52:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF08979A23F2D503092A4956AAA54DF331E4D5E058E9A5B5AF05DAE51E27AD0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The above CN talks about a review with conflicted authors, containing only 9 studies, & with other limitations as acknowledged by its text.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694458994473959429
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF08979A23F2D503092A4956AAA54DF331E4D5E058E9A5B5AF05DAE51E27AD0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1692856329361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1694458994473959429EF08979A23F2D503092A4956AAA54DF331E4D5E058E9A5B5AF05DAE51E27AD0F