Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-24 04:07:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C836A58F5CB9231E07F74E356F2A3C60B816E6359E16B112E945D5AC4152CD5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Fact-checkers have growth in number are biased to those who fund them. Their 'outcome' supports donor (and govt) ideology, which creates false legitimacy and public division. They 'cherry-pick' stories and take snippets to support the desired propaganda. Wag the dog. https://www.allsides.com/blog/6-ways-fact-checkers-are-biased

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694450629014597649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C836A58F5CB9231E07F74E356F2A3C60B816E6359E16B112E945D5AC4152CD5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1692850077674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1694450629014597649C836A58F5CB9231E07F74E356F2A3C60B816E6359E16B112E945D5AC4152CD5E