Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-24 12:54:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EEF19687586FCB8E9C8C8187F076EF3D80BFA473B4D8FCB8B08CC9EFFCF908A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Note niet nodig. Hoewel hypocriet gezien de context van wachtgeld en Richard de Mos, gaat het hier om een mening en niet om een inhoudelijke discussie(punt).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694360313271873574
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EEF19687586FCB8E9C8C8187F076EF3D80BFA473B4D8FCB8B08CC9EFFCF908A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1692881652866
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1694360313271873574EEF19687586FCB8E9C8C8187F076EF3D80BFA473B4D8FCB8B08CC9EFFCF908A5