Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-23 16:11:01 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E31BEAD6B077A51BEA5B1D5D3505ED6E7F3F9EF2AC508B7DA22E7F1B7220F2C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Note niet nodig. Hoewel hypocriet gezien de context van wachtgeld en Richard de Mos, gaat het hier om een mening en niet om een inhoudelijke discussie(punt).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694360313271873574
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E31BEAD6B077A51BEA5B1D5D3505ED6E7F3F9EF2AC508B7DA22E7F1B7220F2C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1692807061245
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1694360313271873574E31BEAD6B077A51BEA5B1D5D3505ED6E7F3F9EF2AC508B7DA22E7F1B7220F2C2